What is actually Absolutely everyone obtaining good accuracy with for 180gr pills and 4831? Just trying to find a place to begin so I do not squander lots of parts. Many thanks for the help!
They may be exactly the same detail, but H4831 sc is Reduce shorter so it is going to pack right into a circumstance easier then the conventional, and in some instances like our 7mm rem mag it makes it possible for us to include extra powder then just the conventional H4831.
The reality that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is precisely why you happen to be looking at higher velocities received with that powder, versus Everything you've witnessed While using the IMR stuff. Also excellent powder, but fairly superior suited to slightly smaller sized situations that has a little bit less capacity.
That means the knowledgable handloader can, with a few extrapolation, discover a beginning load when just one is detailed for a particular cartridge.
Yup or it is not going to perform effectively. And Because the OP incorporates a load making use of Varget I might test to discover somebody to trade with. Could possibly come up with a win earn problem.
WARNING: This solution can expose you to guide, which is thought into the Point out of California to bring about most cancers and delivery defects or other reproductive hurt. For more info go to – .
Nampa, Idaho In my expertise the only real actual change is that the shortcut meters much better as a result of reloading tools. At the time It really is loaded theres no purposeful distinction. I have read that the shortcut can have a very small little bit faster burn fee but it h4831sc load data seems insignificant.
Anyhow, I desired to give some 7828SC a try to lessen a lot of the compression. What a mistake, I couldn't get this powder to shoot correctly or develop the velocities I get with conventional 7828.
While using the smoother flow characteristics comes more uniform demand weights, though h4831 vs h4831sc the person grains orient extra compactly, building improved loading density.
Furthermore, it goes on to declare that because of the fshorter grains, that load density is likely to be somewhat better.
This really is an older thread, you might not receive a response, and will be reviving an outdated thread. Remember to take into account creating a new thread.
Like Everybody claimed, the SC stands for “limited Lower” and it is a bit much easier to meter. Can make you issue why they would nevertheless make the frequent 1.
Though IMR 4831 and H4831SC are diverse powders, you will see that in many circumstances, wherever one of these is listed one other will be also. Also, you will find there is a fairly regular marriage between them in regards to outlined loads.
This seems like a fantastic spot to disclose a little bit more information on Hodgdon, H4831 precisely...I when experienced a pound of H4831SC sit on the shelf for quite a few decades. It was ordered before Hodgdon began publicizing the "Serious" line of powders, h4831 vs h4831sc of which the H4831s are an element.